Posts from the “Privacy, censorship & surveillance” Category

Initial thoughts on the new Instagram terms of use

Posted on 18 December 2012

There’s been a lot of good analysis and a lot of FUD going round about the proposed new Instagram terms. I have only skimmed them thus far but here’s my initial take:

Facebook has owned Instagram since April this year and have been thinking about how to bring this new acquisition into the fold. These new terms are part of whatever grand plan they have in mind. Put simply, the new Instagram terms of use aim to harmonise the Instagram and Facebook arrangements with users for the purpose introducing Facebook’s ‘subtle and social’ advertising process on Instagram.

Yes some of what they want to do with your private data sucks, but Facebook has already been screwing you in that department. What I think is more telling is how these terms attempt to allow Facebook to blur the lines between user-generated content and paid content even further by making users ‘consent’ to not have to be told something is an ad. I think Facebook are testing the waters with such an approach with their smaller network before rolling it to the 1 billion users on the Facebook platform. It will be interesting to see if such moves will butt up against consumer protection laws related to advertising.

I’ll post a more detailed analysis when I have had time to read the proposed terms in more detail.

Share Button

Paolo Cirio’s street art spectres

Posted on 26 September 2012

Image: Wheatpaste photograph reproduced from Google Street View. Credit: Street Ghosts - Berlin - Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin - 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012.

Italian-born street artist Paolo Cirio is well known for his clever albeit sometime illegal creative practice, and his new project is no break from this tradition. Street Ghosts saw him take to the streets of London, Berlin and New York with life-sized reproductions of images of people captured by the Google Maps Street View vehicles. Cirio wheatpaste these photos back into the urban environments where they were (often unknowingly) immortalised on the popular mapping tool.

This work combines so many things I am interested in! Maps, geolocation, street-art, copyright, the relationship between digital and ‘real’ environments and actions, urbanism and urban studies. What I particularly love is the paradox it presents. To borrow from Cirio’s artist statement (which I highly recommend reading):

As the publicly accessible pictures are of individuals taken without their permission, I reversed the act: I took the pictures of individuals without Google’s permission and posted them on public walls. In doing so, I highlight the viability of this sort of medium as an artistic material ready to comment and shake our society…

The obscure figures fixed to the walls are the murky intersection of two overlain worlds: the real world of things and people, from which these images were originally captured, and the virtual afterlife of data and copyrights, from which the images were retaken.

These people were captured in a moment that should have been temporary; their bodies time and date stamped onto the urban landscape for much longer than that moment should have lasted. Their often mundane activity—walking to work, heading out for the night, sitting and observing the street—has been imbued with a much longer permanency and stripped almost entirely of context. Cirio is watermarking those bodies to the coordinates at which they were photographed. He is inserting back into the urban environment an echo of a moment in time that has passed, creating from a pseudo public (but actually privately owned) augmented, geo-spatial repository of images a temporary portrait of street life as it was in the (often very recent) past.

But his choice of medium is as much a part of the project as well. Because he is using a well-used street art practice to apply these photographs to their coordinates, the images are susceptible to the same variables that other street art is. Visual content in public places compete for visibility with other content, lasting only as long as they are not covered up or removed. So these echos, unlike their Google Maps equivalent, are much more susceptible to time. Like most street-art, the time at which they will be a part of the streetscape is limited.

Cirio has worked on numerous awesome projects including Face to Facebook where he scraped 1 million Facebook profiles and arranged them by facial expression on a custom-built dating website and Google Will Eat Itself which he developed with Alessandro Ludovico of Neural Magazine (who I had the fortune to hit the road with back in 2007 during the Australian Network for Art and Technology‘s still/open Emerging Technology Lab), a project which, put simply, “uses automated clicking programs to generate Adsense revenue, which is used to purchase Google stock”.

SIDENOTE 6.29AM, 27 September 2012 There is something ironic about a guy who creates some very anti-Google projects hosting the images for this project on Picasa/Google+ Web Albums, right?


Street Ghosts.

via @thornet (Michelle Thorne) (via @frogdesign via @psfk)

Street Ghosts’ Picasa/Google+ albums; Street Ghosts – Exposing specters of Google Street View in real life Street Art in Artist Projects, Eyebeam.

Wheatpasted photographs reproduced from Google Street View. Credits: Hero—Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012. Gallery (in order of appearance)—Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012; Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012; Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012; Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012.

Share Button

White House outlines a privacy blueprint including a Privacy Bill of Rights

Posted on 24 February 2012

The Obama administration has released a Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights to “guide efforts to give users more control over how their personal information is used on the Internet and to help businesses maintain consumer trust and grow in the rapidly changing digital environment.” The Privacy Bill of Rights—which is detailed in full in a report released by the White House entitled Consumer Data Privacy in a Networked World: A Framework for Protecting Privacy and Promoting Innovation in the Global Digital Economy—establishes a baseline for the protection for consumer data by outlining 7 rights consumers can expect in relation to their private data:   Individual Control: Consumers have a right to exercise control over what personal data organizations collect from them and how they use it.…

Share Button