Posts from the “Geolocation & maps” Category

Texting for better transport

Posted on 2 May 2013

That noisy person talking loudly on their mobile phone on the bus might be annoying for everyone else on the trip, but in the not-too-distant future their chatter will be part of the cumulative big data that will help urban planners decide where transport routes should go. By mapping mobility data—the coarse geospatial information generated as your mobile phone connects to or is transferred between radio towers—infrastructure planners can create a picture of how people move about an area and modify service delivery accordingly. While we haven’t seeing this kind of responsive planning design in local government town planning offices just yet (that I am award of anyway), the potential was demonstrated in AllAboard, an entry by the IBM Smarter Cities Technology Centre at IBM’s research lab…

Share Button

Should London’s blue plaques be a popularity contest?

Posted on 8 January 2013

Blue plaque to Oscar Wilde, Portora Royal School by Charlie Phillips

AT “NEARLY £1,000″ for one of English Heritage‘s iconic blue plaques, The Economist‘s Prospero blog argued overnight that the commemorative marker scheme needs modernising. Their (poorly written) call for change is charged not just by the cost of each clay plaque, but by the lack of transparency in the “odd ways” that the plaques are “doled out” and the diminished cultural significance of the scheme in an age where most Londoners “rarely ever even see these badges of honour, often because their eyes are trained on their smartphones.” The solution, according to Prospero: turn the whole scheme over to “committed amateurs” financed through “plaque-wielding Kickstarter campaigns” a delivered to you through a “crowdsourced blue-plaque app.”

Sure, the scheme could do with an overhaul. There are plenty of benefits for such schemes that could be derived from new technologies. Historical geographic information systems (GIS) are nothing new (see for example the Locating London’s Past map). Any GIS for the blue plaques should let users add their own content (like History Channel and Foursquare‘s Explore London map). It could enhance people’s experience with an augmented reality layer that shows curated and UGC photos, videos and historical titbits when you point your smartdevice’s camera at a plaque (like Museum of London‘s Streetmuseum app). Even gamification/incentive-centred design has been done before (letting users collect the History Channel History ♥ London badge on Foursquare). While the post only hints at crowdsourcing (and seemingly confuses crowdsourcing and crowdfunding), crowdsourcing a shortlist of people, places and events for commemoration would help make the process more collaborative and transparent and (hopefully) reinvigorate public interest in the scheme.

All this said, the one thing I don’t agree with is crowdfunding the cost of producing and mounting the plaques. This is not because I don’t support crowdfunding, but because I don’t think that the committing to public memory of a person or event should come solely down to the populist whims of the crowd and their cash alone.

SIDENOTE 8.26AM, 8 January 2013 Why doesn’t economist.com publish author’s names? Just publish the author’s initials is not very useful when there is no contributor’s list!


Blue plaques existed here, 1866-2013 C.S-W on Prospero, The Economist, 7 January 2013.

‘Blue plaque to Oscar Wilde, Portora Royal School’ by Charlie Phillips. The image is used under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic licence. You are free to share and remix the image too provided you attribute the photographer.

Share Button

Paolo Cirio’s street art spectres

Posted on 26 September 2012

Image: Wheatpaste photograph reproduced from Google Street View. Credit: Street Ghosts - Berlin - Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin - 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012.

Italian-born street artist Paolo Cirio is well known for his clever albeit sometime illegal creative practice, and his new project is no break from this tradition. Street Ghosts saw him take to the streets of London, Berlin and New York with life-sized reproductions of images of people captured by the Google Maps Street View vehicles. Cirio wheatpaste these photos back into the urban environments where they were (often unknowingly) immortalised on the popular mapping tool.

This work combines so many things I am interested in! Maps, geolocation, street-art, copyright, the relationship between digital and ‘real’ environments and actions, urbanism and urban studies. What I particularly love is the paradox it presents. To borrow from Cirio’s artist statement (which I highly recommend reading):

As the publicly accessible pictures are of individuals taken without their permission, I reversed the act: I took the pictures of individuals without Google’s permission and posted them on public walls. In doing so, I highlight the viability of this sort of medium as an artistic material ready to comment and shake our society…

The obscure figures fixed to the walls are the murky intersection of two overlain worlds: the real world of things and people, from which these images were originally captured, and the virtual afterlife of data and copyrights, from which the images were retaken.

These people were captured in a moment that should have been temporary; their bodies time and date stamped onto the urban landscape for much longer than that moment should have lasted. Their often mundane activity—walking to work, heading out for the night, sitting and observing the street—has been imbued with a much longer permanency and stripped almost entirely of context. Cirio is watermarking those bodies to the coordinates at which they were photographed. He is inserting back into the urban environment an echo of a moment in time that has passed, creating from a pseudo public (but actually privately owned) augmented, geo-spatial repository of images a temporary portrait of street life as it was in the (often very recent) past.

But his choice of medium is as much a part of the project as well. Because he is using a well-used street art practice to apply these photographs to their coordinates, the images are susceptible to the same variables that other street art is. Visual content in public places compete for visibility with other content, lasting only as long as they are not covered up or removed. So these echos, unlike their Google Maps equivalent, are much more susceptible to time. Like most street-art, the time at which they will be a part of the streetscape is limited.

Cirio has worked on numerous awesome projects including Face to Facebook where he scraped 1 million Facebook profiles and arranged them by facial expression on a custom-built dating website and Google Will Eat Itself which he developed with Alessandro Ludovico of Neural Magazine (who I had the fortune to hit the road with back in 2007 during the Australian Network for Art and Technology‘s still/open Emerging Technology Lab), a project which, put simply, “uses automated clicking programs to generate Adsense revenue, which is used to purchase Google stock”.

SIDENOTE 6.29AM, 27 September 2012 There is something ironic about a guy who creates some very anti-Google projects hosting the images for this project on Picasa/Google+ Web Albums, right?


Street Ghosts.

via @thornet (Michelle Thorne) (via @frogdesign via @psfk)

Street Ghosts’ Picasa/Google+ albums; Street Ghosts – Exposing specters of Google Street View in real life Street Art in Artist Projects, Eyebeam.

Wheatpasted photographs reproduced from Google Street View. Credits: Hero—Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012. Gallery (in order of appearance)—Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012; Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012; Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012; Berlin – Dircksenstraße Rochstraße, Berlin – 20, Paolo Cirio, 2012.

Share Button